11.06.2012

Weekly Korean IP Headlines 11.06. 2012

Do you know how much did Apple and Samsung spend for the patent war 2012? It is hard to imagine the amount of money that they spend for the litigations.  It looks like Samsung and Apple are not going to finish the war in the near future even though they are in a symbiotic relationship. This week, Osram and LG found middle ground unlike Samsung and Apple case.   Let’s take a look at what else is going on.  

Huffington post and Reuters reported on the first day of November that new Apple iPad mini uses a display from Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd,.  The gadget-repair specialist company, iFixit, discovered a Samsung display diver chip from Apple’s new iPad mini recently.  The discovery is remarkable because both Apple and Samsung have been engaged in patent disputes across countries, and Apple is believed to be seeking ways to rely less on Samsung.  Here is detailed information.

©iFixit | The screen shot of Samsung display in iPad mini
Reuters and several news agencies reported on November 2nd, LG settled LED Patent dispute with Osram in Korea. LG Innotek and Osram had agreed LED patent suits and dropped all litigation related to lighting product technology in five countries: South Korea, the US, Japan, China and Germany.  Two parties have reached a license agreement for their respective LED patent portfolios and the details are confidential.  Also, they will withdraw all five countries’ patent litigation cases automatically. You can find the detailed information here.
 
©Osram and © LG Innotek
On November 3rd, Cnet reported that Apple had to reissue and update its statement on the British Web site after UK court of Appeal found it to be “untrue” and “incorrect”. Weeks earlier, the U.K. court ordered Apple to apologize to Samsung.  The article said that the notice must stayed on Apple’s site for one month and had to include the statement that Samsung did not infringed Apple’s patents and therefore did not “breach U.K.law.”  However, Apple added their opinion “along with the court-ordered text in a bid to lessen the impact” Finally, the U.K. court ordered Apple to reissue the ‘apology’ on their Web site and number of British newspapers.  Check out how Apple forced to “eat humble pie” according to the original article here.
 
© Apple | The screen shot of Apple's apoloty on the UK Website
Korean Money Today reported on November 4th, Mr.Lim , the head of ‘Seoul Philharmonic’ was convicted guilty in the court of appeals because he illegally used the similar English name of ‘Seoul Philharmonic Orchestra.’ Since its foundation in 1957, ‘Seoul Philharmonic Orchestra’ used its name and the ‘Seoul Philharmonic’ is a different private owned symphony.  The article noted that Sejong Cultural center; the charge of the ‘Seoul Philharmonic Orchestra’ applied service mark registration and finished the process in 2006.  ‘Seoul Philharmonic Orchestra’ also finished trademark application process in 2007.  During the application process, ‘Seoul Philharmonic Orchestra’ filed a civil suit in 2002 and Seoul Central District Court decided in ‘Seoul Philharmonic orchestra’s favor instead of ‘Seoul Philharmonic’ in 2004.  However, Mr. Lim did not stop using the name and faced criminal charges.  Check out the details here.

©Seoul Philharmonic | The website

© Seoul Philharmonic Orchestra | The website
 

DMC Tower 18th~19th Floor, 189 Sungam-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul, Korea
Global Tel: +82-2-726-1104, 1130 | Fax: +82-2-777-7334 | global@wips.co.kr
Japan Tel: +82-2-726-1113, 1107 | Fax: +82-2-777-7334 | wips-jp@wips.co.kr
China, Taiwan Tel: +82-2-726-1038, 1130 | Fax: +82-2-777-7334 | global@wips.co.kr

No comments:

Post a Comment