The so-called ‘checked pattern suit’ between Burberry and LG Fashion is over.
Seoul
Central District Court ended this suit by ruling a compulsory mediation decision.
Last February, Burberry filed a lawsuit against LG Fashion claiming
that LG Fashion should not make and sell any shirts pirating Burberry's checked-pattern. Furthermore, Burberry claimed that LG
Fashion should pay fifty million KRW as a compensation.
Against this, LG Fashion also considered to file a counter-suit claiming
that
the checked pattern is one of the most popular patterns,
thus Burberry interrupted their business.
According to this ruling, LG Fashion paid Burberry thirty
billion won.
Besides, it became forbidden for LG Fashion to use
'Burberry's checked pattern trademark rights’
now and for ever.
Based on a compulsory mediation ruling by Central District Court,
not only LG
Fashion should pay thirty million KRW to Burberry,
but also Burberry should give up the rest of claims as well.
This is quite interesting point.
LG Fashion seemed to be focusing on the part that Burberry should give up the
rest of claims. Burberry did not file any objection on this ruling,
and gave up requesting prohibition of sales on LG Fashion shirts.
Also, LG Fashion did not admit that they infringed Burberry's trademark rights.
On the other hand, Burberry interpreted that the meaning of ruling is already a proof of Court acknowledging trademark infringement of LG Fashion.
However, industry people regard this lawsuit result as a
victory of Burberry.
The reason is, even though the mediation ruled that 'Burberry should give up the rest of claims' but it does not mean that ‘Burberry should give up
rights.’
or ‘LG Fashion can use the checked-pattern.’
Actually LG Fashion already stopped producing problematic pattern shirts, and this seems to be the reason why Burberry gave up easily requesting prohibition of sale.
<above is Burberry related trademark search result at Kipris.co.kr.>
The reason Burberry's checked pattern can be registered as trademark
not design is
that pattern itself could be recognized as Burberry'.
As it is trademark, Burberry can keep their rights by renewing it every 10 years.
If other products using similar pattern with Burberry's appear in the future,
they can claim infringement of trademark again.
Burberry and LG Fashion are taking different stances on this suit result.
Even though the lawsuit is over, tension between them
seems to continue.